In this 2017 GDC session, Immersyve’s Scott Rigby explains why it is extremely valuable for developers to have a nuanced understanding of player autonomy, enabling them to satisfy players while avoiding common traps that lead down bad design roads.
Register for GDC:
Join the GDC mailing list:
Follow GDC on Twitter:
GDC talks cover a range of developmental topics including game design, programming, audio, visual arts, business management, production, online games, and much more. We post a fresh GDC video every day. Subscribe to the channel to stay on top of regular updates, and check out GDC Vault for thousands of more in-depth talks from our archives.
Nguồn: https://speakforchange.org/
Xem thêm bài viết khác: https://speakforchange.org/game/
Xem thêm Bài Viết:
- That Time My Dead Cells Review Was Copied (RESOLVED)
- Luther Vandross – Don't Want To Be A Fool (Official Video)
- In-game Units in Cinematics – Red Alert 2: Yuri's Revenge
- Peret em Heru (For the Prisoners) Egyptian Horror Survival Game!
- Bobo Plays car at Home | Kid at Home | Games Song + More Nursery Rhymes & Kids Songs -Jugnu Kids
I really feel if you try to put too much psychoanalysis behind a game though you really lose the soul and it ends up being terrible.
Great talk. Just great!
this talk is EXACTLY what I was looking for, explanation of why and how to approach the problem, many thanks, this was truly helpful
Not a gamedev, but this talk was EXTREMELY USEFUL and very-very interesting especially in "the challenge" perspective. I hope some gamedevs would take those lessons to heart and use them responsibly (I'm looking at you, EA).
This is largely why 4X games suck players in for so long.
For the most part I like this talk and think it's valuable, except near the end when he goes full hog behaviorist. Especially at the end when he dreams of games that adjust to your psychological profile it becomes really scary. The problem is that companies will not use this to make better games but they will and probably do already to a degree use these methods to keep players engaged, hooked, addicted and exploit them.
4:50 lol, he's wrong. an open world game analysis that's lacking "curiosity" as basic motivation is way off. Should be entertaining to finish watching though.
12:26 oops now he's comparing open world and linear story based games on how similar they are. :/ I'm done.
Fundamentally in Wild Hunt, players are roll playing as a Witcher. The fact that they are Geralt only narrows your range of agency they have to shape the game world. Assuming they are invested in their play through y. Contrarily in Skyrim, players can be one of many races and class. Immersion in the narrative here is different depending on the character selection. If in fact these two games provide identical age risk ability, then is the player’s autonomy more freedom to explore the world rather than volition to engage in the narrative/world?
18:00 this just seems like common sense you shouldn't need research to understand. basic design 101
I don't understand how anyone can talk about player agency without talking about Mount and Blade.
Chris Roberts is shooting for just this. I hope we get it.
It is basically about yet another own interpretation of Self-Determination Theory (Autonomy, Relatedness, Competence)
Wasn't that already up on the channel?
Calling the RPG systems of Skyrim dense and rich (!) seems a bit silly to me. Otherwise good talk.
seems like a huge issue for a lot of games these days.